Advisory notes yet to abide to if this project is to succeed
Here are some brain given by a person deemed to have plenty of experience in this field.
Please note down the points you feel are relevant to the kids's education project and compare them with our observations found in the comment section. If different, please send in yours such that no useful advice is ignored! Many thanks!
+------------------------------------------------------+
PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION
Our communities face different problems that they are not able to solve on their own. They need different people and institutions to be their partners in developing “community projects”.
When an organisation or individuals seek to help a given community in addressing their problems, it is worth bearing in mind that participative methods have proved to offer two invaluable advantages: sustainability and creation of "community ownership”.
A number of projects failed as their initiators ignored beneficiaries in the planning or implementing stage.
A secret for a successful project (owned and touching people’s real needs) is beneficiaries’ participation: whereby a common motto “nothing for us without us”!!!
In the following sections I am going to explain briefly different stages of a project cycle management. These are my own notes and whenever you feel you need more explanations or any further assistance please send me an email here
1. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
A community has many and different problems. The common word used to refer to those problems is “poverty”. Although all are commonly known as problems, you may find that some are causes while others are consequences of the existing problems!!!
It is a worth exercise to identify with the population you want to serve, their problems. Allow them to make an exhaustive list of all their problems without, off course, raising unnecessary expectations.
2. PROBLEM ANALYSIS
The problem analysis aims mainly at categorising those problems and prioritizing them. It is important that the population realises and decides what their real problem is; in other words what is their root problem. You will be amazed that causes are few and consequences are multiple and in most cases our actions are directed to consequences!!!!
After that categorization, you should tell the population that they can not solve at once those problems. They have to select priority sectors where actions should be taken. For instance in the case of this particular parish “education can be a priority sector”.
In the selected sectors, they are going to rank their problems according to the level of importance. Serious problems will be on the top of the list while those less serious will be on the bottom. You should let them know that they have to choose those which are seriously affecting their children education. Hopefully “lack of food may be one of the top priorities”. You are allowed to contribute to their “list of priorities “if you realise they have forgotten an important problem.
They choose one or two problems to start with and you design a project on how to solve them.
3. PROJECT DESIGN
As you made a list of problems, in this stage you have to make a list of solutions to the identified problem!!!!
The population may have a variety of answers to the raised question. For instance “lack of food” can be solved through:
- providing lunch to mostly needy children at school
- assisting parents in starting income generating activities so they can feed their kids easily
- giving food assistance to poor families etc.
Again, the community prioritises those solutions. Their prioritisation should aim at finding out which solution responds better to the existing problem. Feasibility as well as costs should be kept into minds. This is important as most of better solutions are not feasible in a short time or require a lot of costs.
Let us assume that the solution of “providing lunch at school to mostly needy children” is accepted and chosen as the project in which you are going to invest.
At that stage, together with community and other stakeholders you identify how you are going to formulate your answer. This is where timeline and contributions from parents, church, children; are considered. For instance they will identify what the church can do such as providing kitchen facilities and a field where vegetables can be grown; parents may offer to make a rotation to cook for these children (after all they would cook for them at home); they can offer to cultivate those rice fields free of charge, providing for wood and other accessories etc.
You make sure you write down the points identified and should know that your role is to facilitate this process. So you should make sure that all necessary points are highlighted such as when the project should start, how many children should be fed at the beginning, how will the selection process undertaken, costing and time schedule for each activity are identified and responsibility are assigned to every stakeholder etc.
4. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
Now it is time to implement our project. You should make sure that the community has availed what they were supposed to. Then implement the project as designed it together with the population. Usually it is good to have a logical framework showing how every thing will be done.
5. PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION
At each stage of the PCM it is important to evaluate what you are doing and monitor the success in order to make necessary adjustments. It enables you to check if you are still on the track and every one is playing their role.
Note: Hopefully these notes may help you in this project. As I said it is a brief explanation but if you need further assistance do not hesitate to come back to me by email (please click here)l!!!!
Recommended Polite Notice: To go back to the Front Page thus chose topics and navigate easily on RSVP blog, please click here.
©CHARITY No:SC038526. CONTACT: 101 Willowpark Crescent, AB16 6XU. TREASURY: 4 Wrights Lane, Hilton, Aberdeen, AB24 4RY.
2 Comments:
Thanks for your advice. I wander whether,this being a tiny project, some of the points may not be directly applicable to us.
First, although education is KEY to the wellfare (success) of any given community, it might never be identified as need, in fact not prioritized, by village people who have very little if any literacy background.
So, would running seminars on the importance of education to the parents and children enrolled on the scheme before the start and then regularly (i.e. montthly or clear time table of seminars) theresince be as efficient?
Requirements: This will imply designing and printing out the content of the seminars and availing material to use during those seminars; a volunteer to run them; seminars time table; certificate or a small gift for attendance etc...
Second, regarding ownship of the project, since donors are providing about half of the money required to run rice field, would promoting the view that the parents are puttinig in much more than donors help OWN the project?
If this is used wisely and strategically, would producing clear list of responsibilities to each stakeholder (parents, church, donors) and designing regular surveys to assess the level of commitment be OK?
Requirements: Designing easy survey questions assessing the level of commitment; a time table to pass these survey questions; a volunter to compute and analyse the results of such surveys.
Third, from the advisory notes received, it is true that we need to design a policy of follow up and evaluation (i.e. is the project succeeding?).
Requirements: Questionaire-type survey to ask the kids, parents and church how they feel the project is going; whether they feel the right things are being done or not and suggest alternatives; a time table to run such questionaire-type survey; a volunteer to analyse and compute them.
Finally, all the above are good safeguards but the problem is that they involve huge bureaucracy and huge expenses in printing etc...; a big number of volunteers.
So, would we need:
1.A manager for sensibilisation: running seminars on the importance of education to kids and parents on a regular basis (time table). This manager would accept to print survey questions (pre-prepared by us?), compute answers to these questions at his/her purse; and send answers or post the answers unto the blog (internet paid from his/her purse).
2. A second manager to run the rice field: plan the time table for jobs; inform the parents (and church) clearly what and when jobs are due; Make sure jobs deemed are done at the right time with the right number of hands (more hands make light work); conduct surveys to assess the level of commitment (time table); print the survey question (from his/her purse), compute answers (from his/her purse).
3. A third manager to run surveys on progress: Do the parents, kids, and church feel the project is going in the right direction, and gather opinions etc... Tasks: print off survey questions; pass them unto each stakeholder; compute the results, analyse the results and propose changes/adjustments.
4. A fourth manager to run the school meal: tasks:
-Liaising with the church to ensure there are 2 or more people to cook for the kids Monday to Friday (for entire term time); a time table in which people fill in their names if available would be passed to the church and that it is filled each week (or month) in advance.
- Making sure the kids deemed to eat have actually eaten each week: collecting signitures daily or weekly;
- Organizing shopping (rice and sauce foodstuffs etc...)
- Storing harvest from rice field (liaising with church for store room)
- Liaising with the church for garden plot, and with the headteacher for its running (what to plant; is there a teacher helping kids to grow vegetables on line etc...?).
I agree absolutely in principle with what you said about the benefits of getting the community involved in the decision making. In the case of our proposed project the cooperation of the parents, local church & school are vital to the success of the project, certainly to the expansion to include more than 12 children.
However, I have some misgivings because at the moment our proposed project is so small- if we invite suggestions/ ask for priorities etc we may give the impression that we can deliver more than we actually can and this could cause disappointment and make people lose interest in the project very quickly.
Also, as our funding is very small at the moment I would wish to keep administration costs as low as possible so that our funds can go directly to fund the project.
I feel that the way forward could be to :-
1.Explain in detail our proposals & see if we get a favourable reaction & firm promises of help.
2.If we do get a favourable response - commence the feeding project with initialy 12 children & expanding as soon as possible through growth of own crops to more children.
3.Once this has been running successfully for a while invite suggestions of other projects/priorities that we could consider/evaluate etc.
In this way the community would have an idea of our commitment to fulfill our promises & also a better idea of the limited funding which we have available.
I don't pretend to be an expert in any way & would welcome further comments & advice as appropriate.
Post a Comment << Home
©CHARITY No:SC038526. CONTACT: 101 Willowpark Crescent, AB16 6XU. TREASURY: 4 Wrights Lane, Hilton, Aberdeen, AB24 4RY.